Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
[x]

deviantART

 
:icondindarkness:

~dindarkness

Is pugnacious in the extreme.
ProfileGalleryPrintsFavesJournal

Me, Dinny, and you, the world. We need to talk.

Sat Apr 19, 2008, 4:24 AM
  • Mood: Not Impressed
  • Listening to: The BGM.
  • Reading: Shit all.
  • Watching: My sanity crumble. Still.
  • Playing: Ragnarok Online.
Take a seat. Make yourself comfortable. I just have some thoughts (or if you want to be frank, "bitches") I need to share with the general public. Like you care. But at the same time, I feel a lot of you will agree with what I have to say on two matters that just occurred to me whilst browsing DeviantART.

Epiphany #1: The furry fandom is extremely laughable.

Now this is an odd claim for me to make. I haven't exactly advertised it, but I do have a fursona that I frequently use and so I can claim to be a 'furry' perhaps. Right. Even I recognize this as being a little odd, but there's nothing wrong with it. Its just like someone drawing a cartoon version of themself. We never draw ourselves 100% accurately (Unless we're talking realism here), so fantasy comes into play. No big deal.

I have no issues against furries, but some of the furry culture is laughable. About 75% of it is made up of self-conscious nymphomaniacs.

I'm sure you're all familiar with Jessica Elwood: [link] . Her deviations commonly occur in the ';Popular' and ';Prints' section on Deviantart's front page. First off, she's a brilliant artist. She has excellent technique and I wholeheartedly support the body image she's promoting, with images of buxom and healthily-bodied women, as opposed to tiny twigs with monolithic, gravity-defying breasts (I also enjoy the fact that her breasts tend to obey gravity too.)

At the same time, and I hate to use her as an example since I admire her ability... Have you noticed something in her gallery? A trend, perhaps? I'll tell you. She has 180 Deviations according to her front page. From a rough count, about 30 of these are pictures of herself (her own fursona). This seems quite a small number compared to the 180 total (even if I didn't look through them all). But bear in mind that more than half of these feature her either naked or barely clothed. I know I'm going to get flamed to hell for this, but come on. A 22 year old woman posting multiple suggestive pictures of her cat/dog/fox alter ego on the internet for the world to see. It's like being a weak porn star. People who do that are often looking for attention (since people identify her with her fursona even though in reality, its a freaking drawing. She's a woman sitting at a computer, not a wolf/cat/dog/fox/penguin thing). If she wants the world to think she's a hot sex beast, why restrict it to fantastical images? Why not post pictures of yourself spreading on the internet? I know that's an ambitious comment, granted that her art is neither extremely pornographic nor drawn for the purpose to seduce/stroke her ego. She's just doing art, the end. I'm just raising a point here. There are people much, much worse out there, and I'm about to show you the breaking point of this.

Allow me to introduce to you: [link]

ALL but ONE of the pictures in her gallery are pictures of her fursona/alter ego either making out with some random dude or naked somewhere. And she doesn't have the talent to back it up with either. She came out and said it: she traces hentai to make these drawings. Frequently. And she actually took the next step and posted photographs of herself. What can I say though? At least the breast size is accurate.

And on a final note, when I see these erotic furry drawings. And I NEVER see this on nude photography or erotic realism... Furry erotica... I always have a quick scroll through the comments. Always, there is at least one person that is really unsubtle, like "OH GOD. *ERECTION*" (actual quote from one of Chalo's works) or "THAT MAKES ME SO HORNY!!!!" and I have a quick look at their profile. Some of these kids are boys as young as 13. Jesus christ. I know it's normal for them to be looking up pr0n and etc etc, but when you're that young, animals fucking usually isn't a turn on. It takes many years of jading to prefer a fox and a bird yiffing to actual human porn.

All in all, as much as I enjoy the fandom, it has many, many laughable points. I'm almost reluctant to call myself a furry and identify myself with this population.

Devious Comments

love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:icontanukitsune1:
I don't think there is anything wrong with people making their "fursona" super sexy, since we all know it's just an avatar and that you probably don't look like that at all, and not only furries do that, may people do...

90% of female manga artists draw themselves 10 times more beautiful than they really are, for example...
:icondindarkness:
Agreed, I know where you're coming from. Its just like some people abuse it though. I mean come on. When your gallery is NOTHING but images of yourself? (See second link I provided)

But I do know what you mean, and I agree. But there is a line.

--
:halfliquid: Sexy time is all the time when Din's around. :halfliquid:
:icontanukitsune1:
I think I used to follow someone who basically only drew herself half naked or very smexily, all for his boyfriend...

I eventually got bored of her art and "dumped" her...

This other girl kinda reminds me of her, except the other girl drew herself human and had normal sized breasts! XP
:icondindarkness:
xD Haha! Yeah, thats exactly what I mean. Odd ain't it? It's not like they're trying to refine their artistic ability or anything (some do, but, I think those are rare. Ya gotta experiment!)

--
:halfliquid: Sexy time is all the time when Din's around. :halfliquid:
:icontanukitsune1:
I guess we want more than good illustrations, we need characters with a little more depth that do more than make out and pose half naked?
:icondindarkness:
Exactly!

--
:halfliquid: Sexy time is all the time when Din's around. :halfliquid:

Site Map